Aeronautics Industry

Pat Flannery · Guest

Neil Gerace wrote:

Scott Lowther · Guest

Fred J. McCall wrote:

Fred J. McCall · Guest

Scott Lowther <scottlowther@ix.netcom.SPAMBLOK.com> wrote:

:Fred J. McCall wrote:
:>
:>Well, we were until you veered off into the intellectual ditches and
:>started bleating about how 'lack of existence' was somehow 'proven
:>scientifically'.
:>
:
:I never said anything of the kind. That beign the case... you're clearly
:little more than a troll, unworthy of more of my time.
:

You know, 'proven' only means one thing.

You're obviously back to Stupid Usenet Tricks 101. If you've run your
mouth to the point where you cannot win, whine about how the guy
beating you about the head and shoulders is "a troll".

Time for you to run off with your tail between your legs, Lowther...

--
"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the
soul with evil."
-- Socrates

liberalhere@yahoo.com · Guest

Fred J. McCall <fmccall@earthlink.net> wrote in
news:rrt4631dkqoucglq7ldsr4bvtm4gd0ndip@4ax.com:

Fred J. McCall · Guest

"liberalhere@yahoo.com" <liberalhere@yahoo.com> wrote:

:Fred J. McCall <fmccall@earthlink.net> wrote in
:news:rrt4631dkqoucglq7ldsr4bvtm4gd0ndip@4ax.com:
:
:> "liberalhere@yahoo.com" <liberalhere@yahoo.com> wrote:
:>
:>:
:>:So, you're saying that the "ether" may well exist since all
:>:we have is an absense of evidence for it.
:>:
:>
:> No, and you're to be congratulated on not understanding,
:> well, pretty much anything about science, religion, OR 'the
:> ether'.
:>
:>:
:>:Arguing that alternative explanations for the transmission of
:>:light exist that don't require "ether" would be like arguing
:>:there are explanations for how the world works that don't
:>:rely on moment-to-moment miracles of a god.
:>:
:>
:> Sorry to disappoint you, but 'ether' was disproved. It's not
:> just a matter of 'ether' not being required.
:
:Wrong, there just is a better model that contains predictions
:which have been shown to be correct. But ether, like dark matter,
:simply hasn't been detected. (Sayyyyyy, ya don't
:think.......naaaahhh.)
:
:The old description of "ether" was shown to be incorrect. String
:theory has undergone several revesions. Maybe "ether" simply
:needs a more accurate physical description.
:

Yes, and the 'new' ether turns out to have zero relevance to the
predictive power of models. It adds nothing by its presence and
subtracts nothing by its absence. Hence it is irrelevant (not
'disproved') and is not science (not 'disproved').

Again, learn something about science...

--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson

Scott Hedrick · Guest

"Scott Lowther" <scottlowther@ix.netcom.SPAMBLOK.com> wrote in message
news:EfC8i.9644$B25.1661@news01.roc.ny...

Scott Lowther · Guest

Scott Hedrick wrote:

Fred J. McCall · Guest

"Scott Hedrick" <dinehnmNOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote:

:
:"Scott Lowther" <scottlowther@ix.netcom.SPAMBLOK.com> wrote in message
:news:EfC8i.9644$B25.1661@news01.roc.ny...
:> I never said anything of the kind. That beign the case... you're clearly
:> little more than a troll, unworthy of more of my time.
:
:*You* are getting that way. Killfile him and be done with it. Arguing on
:Usenet is like running in the Special Olympics- even if you win, you're
:still retarded.
:
:Ooops- now I've said it. Let's see what little pissant pops up to take
:umbrage with my use of that term.
:

Nice of you to join in the argument here on Usenet, Scott. Welcome to
the 'short bus'...

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn

Fred J. McCall · Guest

Scott Lowther <scottlowther@ix.netcom.SPAMBLOK.com> wrote:

:Scott Hedrick wrote:
:
:>"Scott Lowther" <scottlowther@ix.netcom.SPAMBLOK.com> wrote in message
:>news:EfC8i.9644$B25.1661@news01.roc.ny...
:>
:>
:>>I never said anything of the kind. That beign the case... you're clearly
:>>little more than a troll, unworthy of more of my time.
:>>
:>>
:>
:>*You* are getting that way. Killfile him and be done with it.
:>
:
:Already done. Anyone who claims that any use of the term "such-and-such
:doesn't exist" is religious bigotry, and who then goes on to bleat about
:what scientific terms mean... well, of all the possibilities of what
:that guy is, "troll" is the optimistic one.
:

And yet here you are, still wanking off...

--
"You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of
your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear."
-- Mark Twain

OM · Guest

On Sun, 3 Jun 2007 21:54:21 -0400, "Scott Hedrick"
<dinehnmNOSPAM@yahoo.com> wrote:

OM · Guest

On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 16:46:28 GMT, Scott Lowther
<scottlowther@ix.netcom.SPAMBLOK.com> wrote:

Pat Flannery · Guest

liberalhere@yahoo.com wrote:

Scott Lowther · Guest

Pat Flannery wrote:

Rand Simberg · Guest

On Mon, 04 Jun 2007 13:16:44 GMT, in a place far, far away, Scott
Lowther <scottlowther@ix.netcom.SPAMBLOK.com> made the phosphor on my
monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:

Fred J. McCall · Guest

Scott Lowther <scottlowther@ix.netcom.SPAMBLOK.com> wrote:

:
:Pat Flannery wrote:
:>
:> liberalhere@yahoo.com wrote:
:>>
:>> BTW, the neurological source for religious experience has been
:>> discovered: the left temporal lobe. Anti-epilepsy medications have
:>> been found to turn off these experiences. In the bible, Paul, on the
:>> way to Damascus, was struck by lightning. This is known to trigger
:>> visions.
:>>
:>
:> Key point of that story is that we only have Paul's word it ever
:> happened.
:>
:
:And as we all know, the *true* scientific method says to take such
:accounts as fact until *proven* wrong... [/Fred]
:

And so Lowther once again demonstrates his absolute lack of reading
comprehension coupled with intellectual and moral bankruptcy.

--
"You take the lies out of him, and he'll shrink to the size of
your hat; you take the malice out of him, and he'll disappear."
-- Mark Twain