Aeronautics Industry
Aeronautics Industry
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Little Joe III?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Aeronautics Industry Forum Index -> Aeronautics Industry
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
surfduke
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:26 am    Post subject: Little Joe III? Reply with quote

See this link:

http://www.orbital.com/NewsInfo/release.asp?prid=605

I think it should be called Little Joe III, (It would be cool!!)!

Carl
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


John
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 7:39 pm    Post subject: Re: Little Joe III? Reply with quote

On Apr 14, 10:26 pm, "surfduke" <surfduke2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
Quote:
See this link:

http://www.orbital.com/NewsInfo/release.asp?prid=605

I think it should be called Little Joe III, (It would be cool!!)!

Carl

or perhaps, Son of Joe. Naaah . . . I agree, Little Joe III

John
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


mmaker@my-deja.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2007 8:28 pm    Post subject: Re: Little Joe III? Reply with quote

On Apr 16, 4:39 pm, "John" <pelc...@charter.net> wrote:
Quote:
or perhaps, Son of Joe. Naaah . . . I agree, Little Joe III

Surely it will have to be 'Big Joe' in order to lift a CEV?

Mark
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Brian Thorn
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 4:42 am    Post subject: Re: Little Joe III? Reply with quote

On 16 Apr 2007 09:28:50 -0700, "mmaker@my-deja.com"
<mmaker@my-deja.com> wrote:

Quote:
or perhaps, Son of Joe. Naaah . . . I agree, Little Joe III

Surely it will have to be 'Big Joe' in order to lift a CEV?

"Big Joe" was a Mercury-Atlas test flight (9/9/59). Hence "Little Joe"
in the first place.

Brian
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


surfduke
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 4:22 pm    Post subject: Re: Little Joe III? Reply with quote

Looks like the booster will be a Peacekeeper-class intercontinental
ballistic missile, (Or a cluster of them). See this link:

http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0704/16orionabort/

There is a under story to all this too. This is the same, (Marry the
Air Force, (For development funding help), path We went down with the
Shuttle in 73. God I hope the CEV does not turn into another truck.
KISS should be the mantra of the design day!!!!
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Aeronautics Industry Forum Index -> Aeronautics Industry All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Board Security

222 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group