| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Craig Fink Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 5:52 pm Post subject: OT: Ron Paul wins Debate by a Landslide. |
|
|
ABC Online poll, indicates Ron Paul won the first Republican Debate by a
huge landslide. ABC, mainstream media outlet, finally admits and reports
that Ron Paul won the debate, publishing a very negative story on the fact.
Trying to turn Ron Paul's huge victory into some sort of defeat.
Reported here,
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alex_wal_070505_press_ignores_paul_g.htm
moving on to ABC's unflattering story,
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3147940
Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, who barely registers in public opinion polls of the
Republican presidential field, won last Thursday night's debate.
That was the unmistakable conclusion of the online poll posted by debate
sponsor MSNBC, which registered Paul with higher positive ratings and lower
negative numbers than any of the other nine candidates on the stage.
ABC's post-debate Internet survey showed an even clearer victory for Paul,
with the congressman taking more than 9,400 of 11,000 votes as of 12:30
p.m. Monday...
....Since online polls aren't scientific -- people choose to take them, and
many people vote multiple times -- doing well in them doesn't necessarily
mean a campaign is on the move...
Lets look at the "current" unscientific results at ABC,
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BeSeenBeHeard/popup?id=3135373
Ron Paul - 12,465
It doesn't matter who won. I wouldn't put America in another Republican's
hands. -1,348
None of them. I'm interested in the possibility of new candidates like Fred
Thompson. - 208
Rudy Guiliani - 193
Mitt Romney - 189
John McCain - 111
Tom Tancredo - 38
Tommy Thompson - 26
Mike Huckabee - 18
Sam Brownback - 13
Duncan Hunter - 13
James Gilmore - 7
Total Vote: 14,629
In first place, Ron Paul with 85%
Second place goes to, I'll never vote for a Republican again with 9%
Third place goes to, None of the above with 1.4%
Fourth place goes to media darling, Rudy Guiliani with 1.3%
Fifth place, another media darling, Mitt Romney with 1.3%
Sixth place, another top running media darling, John McCain with 0.7%
If the "non-scientific" online poll was stuffed, how does ABC explain second
and third place? How do they explain the extremely low numbers of the media
darlings? How do they explain that all nine other Republican Candidates got
at grand total of only 608 votes? Combined, the other nine Candidates would
only be in third place? Exactly how does an "online" poll get unstuffed, to
account for the nine extremely low numbers?
So, what are these "scientific" polls? Scientific, sounds like it must be
done by extremely skilled scientist, accurate,... at Fox News' "Real Clear
Politics" web site,
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-192.html
Looks real scientific to me. ;-/ I didn't know Gingrich was running? Where
are the polls, the "scientific" polls the ABC guy was talking about? The
ones with people who are actually going to run in the Republican Primary?
Who pays for the polls? Who selects the questions on the polls?
MainStream Media, the American Mullahs, who only report the news
on "approved" candidates. Like Iran's "Guardian Council",
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/JafforUllah50622.htm
....well not quite, but similar.
The MainStream Media News Blackout of Ron Paul continues, but the polls are
clear from the first Republican Debate. Anybody who watched the debate, one
man was far above the rest.
Ron Paul, Congratulations on your Debate Victory!
--
Craig Fink
Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ WeBeGood@GMail.Com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Craig Fink Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 8:49 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ron Paul wins Debate by a Landslide. |
|
|
<posted & mailed>
Craig Fink wrote:
| Quote: |
ABC Online poll, indicates Ron Paul won the first Republican Debate by a
huge landslide. ABC, mainstream media outlet, finally admits and reports
that Ron Paul won the debate, publishing a very negative story on the
fact. Trying to turn Ron Paul's huge victory into some sort of defeat.
Reported here,
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alex_wal_070505_press_ignores_paul_g.htm
moving on to ABC's unflattering story,
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3147940
Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, who barely registers in public opinion polls of
the Republican presidential field, won last Thursday night's debate.
That was the unmistakable conclusion of the online poll posted by debate
sponsor MSNBC, which registered Paul with higher positive ratings and
lower negative numbers than any of the other nine candidates on the stage.
ABC's post-debate Internet survey showed an even clearer victory for Paul,
with the congressman taking more than 9,400 of 11,000 votes as of 12:30
p.m. Monday...
...Since online polls aren't scientific -- people choose to take them, and
many people vote multiple times -- doing well in them doesn't necessarily
mean a campaign is on the move...
Lets look at the "current" unscientific results at ABC,
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BeSeenBeHeard/popup?id=3135373
Ron Paul - 12,465
It doesn't matter who won. I wouldn't put America in another Republican's
hands. -1,348
None of them. I'm interested in the possibility of new candidates like
Fred Thompson. - 208
Rudy Guiliani - 193
Mitt Romney - 189
John McCain - 111
Tom Tancredo - 38
Tommy Thompson - 26
Mike Huckabee - 18
Sam Brownback - 13
Duncan Hunter - 13
James Gilmore - 7
Total Vote: 14,629
In first place, Ron Paul with 85%
Second place goes to, I'll never vote for a Republican again with 9%
Third place goes to, None of the above with 1.4%
Fourth place goes to media darling, Rudy Guiliani with 1.3%
Fifth place, another media darling, Mitt Romney with 1.3%
Sixth place, another top running media darling, John McCain with 0.7%
If the "non-scientific" online poll was stuffed, how does ABC explain
second and third place? How do they explain the extremely low numbers of
the media darlings? How do they explain that all nine other Republican
Candidates got at grand total of only 608 votes? Combined, the other nine
Candidates would only be in third place? Exactly how does an "online" poll
get unstuffed, to account for the nine extremely low numbers?
|
Ron Paul answers the question during the second debate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hfa7vT02lA
that, not it, let's see,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hfa7vT02lA
must be in here????????
Are you running for the nomination of the wrong party?
Yes, that's it.
Less, that's it, "Less People" = "R...
| Quote: |
So, what are these "scientific" polls? Scientific, sounds like it must be
done by extremely skilled scientist, accurate,... at Fox News' "Real Clear
Politics" web site,
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-192.html
Looks real scientific to me. ;-/ I didn't know Gingrich was running? Where
are the polls, the "scientific" polls the ABC guy was talking about? The
ones with people who are actually going to run in the Republican Primary?
Who pays for the polls? Who selects the questions on the polls?
MainStream Media, the American Mullahs, who only report the news
on "approved" candidates. Like Iran's "Guardian Council",
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/JafforUllah50622.htm
...well not quite, but similar.
The MainStream Media News Blackout of Ron Paul continues, but the polls
are clear from the first Republican Debate. Anybody who watched the
debate, one man was far above the rest.
Ron Paul, Congratulations on your Debate Victory!
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Borderline Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 8:52 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ron Paul wins Debate by a Landslide. |
|
|
On May 17, 11:49 pm, Craig Fink <WeBeG...@GMail.Com> wrote:
| Quote: |
posted & mailed
Craig Fink wrote:
ABC Online poll, indicates Ron Paul won the first Republican Debate by a
huge landslide. ABC, mainstream media outlet, finally admits and reports
that Ron Paul won the debate, publishing a very negative story on the
fact. Trying to turn Ron Paul's huge victory into some sort of defeat.
Reported here,
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alex_wal_070505_press_ignores...
moving on to ABC's unflattering story,
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3147940
Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, who barely registers in public opinion polls of
the Republican presidential field, won last Thursday night's debate.
That was the unmistakable conclusion of the online poll posted by debate
sponsor MSNBC, which registered Paul with higher positive ratings and
lower negative numbers than any of the other nine candidates on the stage.
ABC's post-debate Internet survey showed an even clearer victory for Paul,
with the congressman taking more than 9,400 of 11,000 votes as of 12:30
p.m. Monday...
...Since online polls aren't scientific -- people choose to take them, and
many people vote multiple times -- doing well in them doesn't necessarily
mean a campaign is on the move...
Lets look at the "current" unscientific results at ABC,
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BeSeenBeHeard/popup?id=3135373
Ron Paul - 12,465
It doesn't matter who won. I wouldn't put America in another Republican's
hands. -1,348
None of them. I'm interested in the possibility of new candidates like
Fred Thompson. - 208
Rudy Guiliani - 193
Mitt Romney - 189
John McCain - 111
Tom Tancredo - 38
Tommy Thompson - 26
Mike Huckabee - 18
Sam Brownback - 13
Duncan Hunter - 13
James Gilmore - 7
Total Vote: 14,629
In first place, Ron Paul with 85%
Second place goes to, I'll never vote for a Republican again with 9%
Third place goes to, None of the above with 1.4%
Fourth place goes to media darling, Rudy Guiliani with 1.3%
Fifth place, another media darling, Mitt Romney with 1.3%
Sixth place, another top running media darling, John McCain with 0.7%
If the "non-scientific" online poll was stuffed, how does ABC explain
second and third place? How do they explain the extremely low numbers of
the media darlings? How do they explain that all nine other Republican
Candidates got at grand total of only 608 votes? Combined, the other nine
Candidates would only be in third place? Exactly how does an "online" poll
get unstuffed, to account for the nine extremely low numbers?
Ron Paul answers the question during the second debate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hfa7vT02lA
that, not it, let's see,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hfa7vT02lA
must be in here????????
Are you running for the nomination of the wrong party?
Yes, that's it.
Less, that's it, "Less People" = "R...
So, what are these "scientific" polls? Scientific, sounds like it must be
done by extremely skilled scientist, accurate,... at Fox News' "Real Clear
Politics" web site,
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/republican_...
Looks real scientific to me. ;-/ I didn't know Gingrich was running? Where
are the polls, the "scientific" polls the ABC guy was talking about? The
ones with people who are actually going to run in the Republican Primary?
Who pays for the polls? Who selects the questions on the polls?
MainStream Media, the American Mullahs, who only report the news
on "approved" candidates. Like Iran's "Guardian Council",
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/JafforUllah50622.htm
...well not quite, but similar.
The MainStream Media News Blackout of Ron Paul continues, but the polls
are clear from the first Republican Debate. Anybody who watched the
debate, one man was far above the rest.
Ron Paul, Congratulations on your Debate Victory!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
|
He certianly wins the Chamberlian award.
Robert |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Craig Fink Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 9:07 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ron Paul wins Debate by a Landslide. |
|
|
Borderline wrote:
| Quote: |
On May 17, 11:49 pm, Craig Fink <WeBeG...@GMail.Com> wrote:
posted & mailed
Craig Fink wrote:
ABC Online poll, indicates Ron Paul won the first Republican Debate by
a huge landslide. ABC, mainstream media outlet, finally admits and
reports that Ron Paul won the debate, publishing a very negative story
on the fact. Trying to turn Ron Paul's huge victory into some sort of
defeat.
Reported here,
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alex_wal_070505_press_ignores...
moving on to ABC's unflattering story,
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3147940
Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, who barely registers in public opinion polls of
the Republican presidential field, won last Thursday night's debate.
That was the unmistakable conclusion of the online poll posted by
debate sponsor MSNBC, which registered Paul with higher positive
ratings and lower negative numbers than any of the other nine
candidates on the stage.
ABC's post-debate Internet survey showed an even clearer victory for
Paul, with the congressman taking more than 9,400 of 11,000 votes as of
12:30 p.m. Monday...
...Since online polls aren't scientific -- people choose to take them,
and many people vote multiple times -- doing well in them doesn't
necessarily mean a campaign is on the move...
Lets look at the "current" unscientific results at ABC,
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BeSeenBeHeard/popup?id=3135373
Ron Paul - 12,465
It doesn't matter who won. I wouldn't put America in another
Republican's
hands. -1,348
None of them. I'm interested in the possibility of new candidates like
Fred Thompson. - 208
Rudy Guiliani - 193
Mitt Romney - 189
John McCain - 111
Tom Tancredo - 38
Tommy Thompson - 26
Mike Huckabee - 18
Sam Brownback - 13
Duncan Hunter - 13
James Gilmore - 7
Total Vote: 14,629
In first place, Ron Paul with 85%
Second place goes to, I'll never vote for a Republican again with 9%
Third place goes to, None of the above with 1.4%
Fourth place goes to media darling, Rudy Guiliani with 1.3%
Fifth place, another media darling, Mitt Romney with 1.3%
Sixth place, another top running media darling, John McCain with 0.7%
If the "non-scientific" online poll was stuffed, how does ABC explain
second and third place? How do they explain the extremely low numbers
of the media darlings? How do they explain that all nine other
Republican Candidates got at grand total of only 608 votes? Combined,
the other nine Candidates would only be in third place? Exactly how
does an "online" poll get unstuffed, to account for the nine extremely
low numbers?
Ron Paul answers the question during the second debate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hfa7vT02lA
that, not it, let's see,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hfa7vT02lA
must be in here????????
Are you running for the nomination of the wrong party?
Yes, that's it.
Less, that's it, "Less People" = "R...
So, what are these "scientific" polls? Scientific, sounds like it must
be done by extremely skilled scientist, accurate,... at Fox News' "Real
Clear Politics" web site,
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/republican_...
Looks real scientific to me. ;-/ I didn't know Gingrich was running?
Where are the polls, the "scientific" polls the ABC guy was talking
about? The ones with people who are actually going to run in the
Republican Primary? Who pays for the polls? Who selects the questions
on the polls?
MainStream Media, the American Mullahs, who only report the news
on "approved" candidates. Like Iran's "Guardian Council",
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/JafforUllah50622.htm
...well not quite, but similar.
The MainStream Media News Blackout of Ron Paul continues, but the polls
are clear from the first Republican Debate. Anybody who watched the
debate, one man was far above the rest.
Ron Paul, Congratulations on your Debate Victory!- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
He certianly wins the Chamberlian award.
?????????????????????????????????????????? |
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Chamberlian
lol, ok |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Craig Fink Guest
|
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 5:53 am Post subject: Re: OT: Ron Paul wins Debate by a Landslide. |
|
|
Ron Paul makes History! ;-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vjQwIcy4OTU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umGpLGbWs9U
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mtzq8tXMmHE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DBST0q5Doi8
A must watch, for a young person, if you haven't voted before.
<posted & mailed>
Craig Fink wrote:
| Quote: |
posted & mailed
Craig Fink wrote:
ABC Online poll, indicates Ron Paul won the first Republican Debate by a
huge landslide. ABC, mainstream media outlet, finally admits and reports
that Ron Paul won the debate, publishing a very negative story on the
fact. Trying to turn Ron Paul's huge victory into some sort of defeat.
Reported here,
http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_alex_wal_070505_press_ignores_paul_g.htm
moving on to ABC's unflattering story,
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3147940
Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, who barely registers in public opinion polls of
the Republican presidential field, won last Thursday night's debate.
That was the unmistakable conclusion of the online poll posted by debate
sponsor MSNBC, which registered Paul with higher positive ratings and
lower negative numbers than any of the other nine candidates on the
stage.
ABC's post-debate Internet survey showed an even clearer victory for
Paul, with the congressman taking more than 9,400 of 11,000 votes as of
12:30 p.m. Monday...
...Since online polls aren't scientific -- people choose to take them,
and many people vote multiple times -- doing well in them doesn't
necessarily mean a campaign is on the move...
Lets look at the "current" unscientific results at ABC,
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/BeSeenBeHeard/popup?id=3135373
Ron Paul - 12,465
It doesn't matter who won. I wouldn't put America in another Republican's
hands. -1,348
None of them. I'm interested in the possibility of new candidates like
Fred Thompson. - 208
Rudy Guiliani - 193
Mitt Romney - 189
John McCain - 111
Tom Tancredo - 38
Tommy Thompson - 26
Mike Huckabee - 18
Sam Brownback - 13
Duncan Hunter - 13
James Gilmore - 7
Total Vote: 14,629
In first place, Ron Paul with 85%
Second place goes to, I'll never vote for a Republican again with 9%
Third place goes to, None of the above with 1.4%
Fourth place goes to media darling, Rudy Guiliani with 1.3%
Fifth place, another media darling, Mitt Romney with 1.3%
Sixth place, another top running media darling, John McCain with 0.7%
If the "non-scientific" online poll was stuffed, how does ABC explain
second and third place? How do they explain the extremely low numbers of
the media darlings? How do they explain that all nine other Republican
Candidates got at grand total of only 608 votes? Combined, the other nine
Candidates would only be in third place? Exactly how does an "online"
poll get unstuffed, to account for the nine extremely low numbers?
Ron Paul answers the question during the second debate.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hfa7vT02lA
that, not it, let's see,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Hfa7vT02lA
must be in here????????
Are you running for the nomination of the wrong party?
Yes, that's it.
Less, that's it, "Less People" = "R...
So, what are these "scientific" polls? Scientific, sounds like it must be
done by extremely skilled scientist, accurate,... at Fox News' "Real
Clear Politics" web site,
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-192.html
Looks real scientific to me. ;-/ I didn't know Gingrich was running?
Where are the polls, the "scientific" polls the ABC guy was talking
about? The ones with people who are actually going to run in the
Republican Primary? Who pays for the polls? Who selects the questions on
the polls?
MainStream Media, the American Mullahs, who only report the news
on "approved" candidates. Like Iran's "Guardian Council",
http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/JafforUllah50622.htm
...well not quite, but similar.
The MainStream Media News Blackout of Ron Paul continues, but the polls
are clear from the first Republican Debate. Anybody who watched the
debate, one man was far above the rest.
Ron Paul, Congratulations on your Debate Victory!
|
--
Craig Fink
Courtesy E-Mail Welcome @ WeBeGood@GMail.Com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Craig Fink Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 4:02 pm Post subject: Re: OT: Ron Paul wins Debate by a Landslide. |
|
|
Hyper wrote:
| Quote: |
On May 23, 4:53 am, Craig Fink <WeBeG...@GMail.Com> wrote:
Ron Paul makes History! ;-)
So did Mike Gravel, but neither stand a chance in hell.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YgReh16g9Xw
Remember the Dems in 2004? They decided to play it safe and Kerry
turned out to be a paper tiger.
R.Paul may have struck a chord with the viewers, but come elections
people will probably go for Giuliani or McCain.
IIRC, it's the second law ) A true republican voter must obey Fox
News ...
BTW, with a Giuliani - McCain ticket there is no question who wears
the pants.
|
lol
Iraq - Ron Paul vs Yahoo News!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQbgA4Rfz-U
Rated R: Language |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Craig Fink Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Martin Postranecky Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 28, 2007 8:48 pm Post subject: NASA History Newsletter - May 2007 |
|
|
NASA History Newsletter - May 2007
http://history.nasa.gov/histnews.htm
Interesting FROM RUSSIA WITH HISTORY report by Asif Siddiqi
- see first 5 pages |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|

222 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|