Aeronautics Industry
Aeronautics Industry
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Dyna-Soar/Atlas-Centaur
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Aeronautics Industry Forum Index -> Aeronautics Industry
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Scott Hedrick
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2007 8:40 pm    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

"Pat Flannery" <flanner@daktel.com> wrote in message
news:1348kh6pi3ghtb5@corp.supernews.com...
Quote:
Man-hours.

A fairly Marxist concept of labor, when you come right down to it, and
entirely independent of costs in a monetary sense.

Many years ago, Florida decided to tax services, including construction. The
state simply decided that 1/4 of the cost of a house was labor, and taxed
appropriately. On the other hand, because my dad pretty much stuck to one of
two models with limited changes and so could could almost make kits (less
than 10% of the lumber needed to be cut on site), his actual labor cost was
less than 17%. He almost had to go to court to get the court to stop
overcharging his customers. The state refused to believe he could sell
houses so inexpensively that they sent an inspector to see how he was
cheating. The inspector bought a house, and the tax was eventually dropped.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Scott Hedrick
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2007 8:43 pm    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

"Pat Flannery" <flanner@daktel.com> wrote in message
news:1348o469pvp230e@corp.supernews.com...
Quote:


Scott Hedrick wrote:
I'm not a skydiver (a minister once told my brother, who had expressed an
interest in being a paratrooper, that only two things fall out of the
sky- birdshit and idiots), but I suspect the spectators would enjoy a
brief shower of yellow rain from me and my buddy in that case...

You do realize that due to total mass and density versus air-drag on the
falling body, that the skydiver is going to hit the ground first,
_followed_ by the urine?

Not if I get the damned reserve chute open. And if I don't, I'm not likely
to care what hit first.

Quote:
Yellow water, yellow water, is put in the can.
Seal it tightly, keep it sprightly, for the beer men once again.

Looks like someone watched Waterworld.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Scott Hedrick
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2007 8:45 pm    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

Let's face it- the correct answer to this subject line is: anyway you can,
as fast as you can, that won't kill you faster.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Rand Simberg
Guest





PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2007 8:49 pm    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

On Fri, 11 May 2007 16:31:12 GMT, in a place far, far away, "Greg D.
Moore \(Strider\)" <mooregr_deleteth1s@greenms.com> made the phosphor
on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:

Quote:
Rand Simberg wrote:
When you see all of the ways that the LAS can cause a bad day to a
nominal mission, I would seriously question its value on Orion.


We've never had a fatal accident to a crew caused by one, and one Soyuz
launch where it saved a crew.

The sample space is far too small to draw many conclusions from that.

Hmm. Define 'far to small'. My understanding is that statistically
anything over 100 samples is "reasonable" and we have what, about 150?

No, not for our vehicles. Only if you include the Soviets/Russians.
I interpreted Pat's "we" to mean the US. The Russians have a
different design, and I can't say what kind of failure modes it has.

Yeah, I was counting the Soviet/Russian design.

Of course actually one could argue we have over 250 samples if you include
systems without a LES. And most likely in at least one of those it would
have saved the crew.

I wasn't making a generic comment about LES. I was talking
specifically about Orion and its launcher. It's questionable whether
the LAS adds, or removes risk from the system, when it has so many
failure modes that can occur on a nominal day, and when it's been a
long time since we had a failure of a modern launcher that would have
required it. Remember, as designed, it's really only needed to get
away from a suddenly exploding launch vehicle, or for a pad abort, not
for a lack of thrust, or loss of control, which is the predominant
failure mode for launchers. It seems like an exceedingly unlikely
failure scenario for the Porklauncher.

I think that it's simply politically incorrect to not have one. No
one at NASA wants to take the slightest chance of having to explain to
Congress why we lost a crew because we once again left out an escape
system. But I'm not sure that they realize that they may have just as
great, or greater a chance of having to explain to Congress why the
(heavy and expensive, every flight) escape system killed the crew on
an otherwise nominal mission.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Henry Spencer
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:17 am    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

I wrote:
Quote:
...they were in fact quite cautious with their cosmonauts. The US took
chances that the Russians would never have dreamed of, e.g. manning the
third Saturn V after multiple serious problems on the second. (Korolev's
rule was no manned flights until there were two clean, safe, successful
unmanned tests in a row.)

In fact, that third Saturn V, and the race to be the first to fly around
the Moon, is a good example of the difference in attitudes. (The race to
the lunar surface was never very close, but *this* one was neck and neck
pretty much until the final turn.)

The US, seeing the Soviet program fuzzily from a distance, concluded from
the Zond tests that a Soviet manned lunar flyby was imminent. Okay, time
to Roll The Big Dice: put a crew on the third Saturn V despite major
problems on the second, *and* put a crew in lunar orbit without an LM as
backup return propulsion. A bit risky, but oh, what a payoff in pride and
prestige if it works...

Whereas the Soviets could see that the US was contemplating rewriting the
Apollo flight sequence to beat Zond. But those Zond tests hadn't been
nearly as successful as they appeared from afar, so by the "two successful
tests" rule, a manned Zond to beat the US was out of the question. Some
of the cosmonauts favored risking it, but upper management flatly refused
to even consider it. Too risky.
--
spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer
mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | henry@spsystems.net
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


alain245@sympatico.ca
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 4:39 am    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

On May 11, 6:34 am, Pat Flannery <flan...@daktel.com> wrote:
Quote:
alain...@sympatico.ca wrote:

I don't think I like that kind of redundancy. At our skydiving club,
there
once were two guys who opened their chutes too close to one another.
The chutes got tangled together. Fortunetly their reserve chutes
worked
fine.

What if you get a streamer on your main chute, and open your reserve
chute without first jettisoning the main chute, so they become entangled?
That's happened fatally more than once due to panic by skydivers.

I don't think it happens much anymore. I know it did happen a long
time
ago. But nowadays you have a single cord to pull for both jettisoning
the main and deploying the reserve. If you pull the cord only half way
the main is jettisoned but the reserve isn't deployed, I don't
recommend
doing that.


Alain Fournier
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


alain245@sympatico.ca
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 5:06 am    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

On May 11, 7:22 am, Pat Flannery <flan...@daktel.com> wrote:
Quote:
Fred J. McCall wrote:

One is left wondering what the Soviet military effort would look like
using the same 'fair' criteria for measuring it. Pretty small, I
would bet...

Man-hours.
Total man-hours used on the whole thing; right from mining up the
materials used to make the metals that build the rockets and payloads,
through man-hours spent in designing them, manufacturing them, launching
them, and supporting their missions.
A fairly Marxist concept of labor, when you come right down to it, and
entirely independent of costs in a monetary sense.
You could bias this by total population potential man-hours of work for
the two countries.
In that case, it might have come out fairly even.

I've got a friend who went to work on a water treatment plant project
in Africa a few years ago. His company had a contract for engineering
and supervision, but they were not to do any construction work, that
was to be done completely by locals. One day they told the Africans
that they had to dig a trench about 1km long and 2m deep where a
pipe was to be laid. The Africans had two mechanical diggers (I don't
know if that is the proper term in English, could someone please
tell me how those tractors with big shovels are called) so my friend
thought they would need a week or two to do the job. But the next
day the two mechanical diggers did not move an inch. On the other
hand a few hundred men came each with a spade and did the job
in two days. My friend was told that it was better to be a little less
efficient and have more men receiving a salary than to use the
mechanical diggers and have a few hundred extra men on the
unemployment roll.

Do you think that counting the man-hours of work on that water
trearment
plant would be a fair way to evaluate the cost?


Alain Fournier
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Pat Flannery
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 12:10 pm    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

Rand Simberg wrote:
Quote:
It seems like an exceedingly unlikely
failure scenario for the Porklauncher.


I think the Porklauncher itself is an extremely unlikely prospect; I
doubt this thing ever gets built in any form.

Pat
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Pat Flannery
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 12:51 pm    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

Scott Hedrick wrote:
Quote:

Many years ago, Florida decided to tax services, including construction. The
state simply decided that 1/4 of the cost of a house was labor, and taxed
appropriately. On the other hand, because my dad pretty much stuck to one of
two models with limited changes and so could could almost make kits (less
than 10% of the lumber needed to be cut on site), his actual labor cost was
less than 17%. He almost had to go to court to get the court to stop
overcharging his customers. The state refused to believe he could sell
houses so inexpensively that they sent an inspector to see how he was
cheating. The inspector bought a house, and the tax was eventually dropped.

H.G. Wells cameup with the "Air Dollar" in his book "The Shape of Things

to Come".
This was based on the concept of how much it cost Wings Over The World
to move one hundred pounds of cargo one hundred miles by air, IIRC.
Which sounds nifty, except when some technological advance suddenly
causes the effort to do that suddenly drop.
(Like when the turboprops arrive)
Britain once had the brilliant idea of locking the copper penny into the
actual price of copper...which works great until you hit copper ore
deposits in your empire that cause the price of copper to go clean
through the floorboards.
A copper twopence coin under George III could serve as either a
paperweight or throwing weapon.
http://www.24carat.co.uk/twopencestoryframe.html
You put a Pound's worth of those pence in your pocket, and you're going
to limp. :-D


Pat
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Pat Flannery
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 1:14 pm    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

Scott Hedrick wrote:
Quote:
Looks like someone watched Waterworld.


No one ever watched Waterworld, the same way that no one ever watched
The Postman.
Even Grease II could beat those twin terrors... but there was only one
Grease, and I a compelled to send the newsgroup this Grease Valentine's
Day card, because Olivia Newton-John could say "Tell me about
it...stud..." in a more sexy way than any girl that I've ever run into:
http://www.onlyolivia.com/visual/grease/misc/valentine.html
Me..I'm still nuts for Diana Manoff's Marty.
I want to be the man on Manoff:
http://www.celebritymoviearchive.com/tour/movie.php/5376
Knockers city! ;-)

Pat
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Pat Flannery
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 1:46 pm    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

Pat Flannery wrote:

That's Dinah Manoff, not Diana Manoff, BTW.
Jesus H. Christ, countries go to war over breasts like those.
Check out Homer, he wrote about situations like this. :-P

Pat
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Neil Gerace
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:14 pm    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

On May 11, 8:23 pm, Pat Flannery <flan...@daktel.com> wrote:
Quote:
Scott Hedrick wrote:
I'm not a skydiver (a minister once told my brother, who had expressed an
interest in being a paratrooper, that only two things fall out of the sky-
birdshit and idiots), but I suspect the spectators would enjoy a brief
shower of yellow rain from me and my buddy in that case...

You do realize that due to total mass and density versus air-drag on the
falling body, that the skydiver is going to hit the ground first,
_followed_ by the urine?
Someone's got to write a song about this called "Yellow Rain".

What about Yellow River by Christie (1970) ....

Quote:
I've already written a song about something like this showing the
immutable aspect of the interconnection between beer drinkers and the
ecosystem, called "Yellow Water":

What comes around, goes around Smile
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Pat Flannery
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 2:24 pm    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

alain245@sympatico.ca wrote:
Quote:
I've got a friend who went to work on a water treatment plant project
in Africa a few years ago. His company had a contract for engineering
and supervision, but they were not to do any construction work, that
was to be done completely by locals. One day they told the Africans
that they had to dig a trench about 1km long and 2m deep where a
pipe was to be laid. The Africans had two mechanical diggers (I don't
know if that is the proper term in English, could someone please
tell me how those tractors with big shovels are called) so my friend
thought they would need a week or two to do the job. But the next
day the two mechanical diggers did not move an inch. On the other
hand a few hundred men came each with a spade and did the job
in two days. My friend was told that it was better to be a little less
efficient and have more men receiving a salary than to use the
mechanical diggers and have a few hundred extra men on the
unemployment roll.

Do you think that counting the man-hours of work on that water
trearment
plant would be a fair way to evaluate the cost?


What this reminds me of when we built the B-29 airfields in China.
We needed huge, long, runways over level ground to let the bombers get
airborne.
The place chosen had boulders in it.
The Chinese moved all of those boulders out, and leveled the ground by
pure brute force, hammering on the boulders for days, and breaking them
down into gravel-sized pieces that could be used to pave those runways.
And that's why we are going to lose this economic war to them.
Because we have nowhere near the methodical patience that they do.
To us, today is everything...to China, it's the blink of an eye, or the
snap of a finger.
We're going to lose this one.

Pat
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Scott Hedrick
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 12, 2007 5:36 pm    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

"Pat Flannery" <flanner@daktel.com> wrote in message
news:134b1eprp0ab269@corp.supernews.com...
Quote:


Scott Hedrick wrote:
Looks like someone watched Waterworld.


No one ever watched Waterworld, the same way that no one ever watched The
Postman.

I considered watching The Postman...until, shortly before I was going to
rent it, I read the book. Can't see any reason why they couldn't have made
the book into the movie. This would require Kevin Costner to *not* be the
guy who beats up the bad guy in the end, which wouldn't have made the movie
any less exciting, but that's not how Hollywood works.

As to Waterworld, seeing an intact National Geographic underwater, even
after all those years of soaking in salt water, was the equivalent of a
fully loaded chain gun to my suspension of disbelief.

Quote:
Even Grease II could beat those twin terrors...

There was no Grease II, in the sense of a sequel to Grease. There was Grease
II, which was a parallel version of Grease- sorta like the Volkswagon
compared to a Cadillac.

Quote:
Me..I'm still nuts for Diana Manoff's Marty.

Talk about eye candy- I just want to put some whipped cream all over her
and...oh, sorry...
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Chris Jones
Guest





PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2007 1:01 am    Post subject: Re: How to leave Dyna-Soar (or MOL) during an Abort WAS: Dyn Reply with quote

henry@spsystems.net (Henry Spencer) writes:

[...]

Quote:
Despite the Russians' Cold War reputation as evil scum careless of human
life, they were in fact quite cautious with their cosmonauts. The US took
chances that the Russians would never have dreamed of, e.g. manning the
third Saturn V after multiple serious problems on the second. (Korolev's
rule was no manned flights until there were two clean, safe, successful
unmanned tests in a row.)

And the first post-Korolev crewed flight, Soyuz 1, violated this
rule. There had been two not-totally-successful unmanned precursor
flights, and the Soviets convinced themselves, as did the Americans
before they flew a crew on the third Saturn V flight, that they
understood and had fixed the problems. As Soyuz 1 showed, not even
close.
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Aeronautics Industry Forum Index -> Aeronautics Industry All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Page 5 of 5

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Board Security

222 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group