| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jonathan
Guest
|
 Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 6:08 pm Post subject: Re: straight skinny |
 |
|
"Dogfighting" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:462ca56a$0$16350$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
| Quote: |
Jonathan wrote:
Fascinating that you conveniently deleted the link I provided that
proves your argument incorrect:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_law
Please read it! Remember, the centre of the Universe is not the USofA !
|
You should read it first, you haven't.
From your link...
Fair use and fair dealing
Main articles: Fair use and Fair dealing
Copyright does not prohibit all copying or replication.
In the United States, the fair use doctrine, codified
by the Copyright Act of 1976 as 17 U.S.C. Section
107, permits some copying and distribution without
permission of the copyright holder or payment to same.
The statute does not clearly define fair use, but
instead gives four non-exclusive factors to consider
in a fair use analysis. Those factors are:
the purpose and character of your use
the nature of the copyrighted work
what amount and proportion of the whole work
was taken, and
the effect of the use upon the potential market
for or value of the copyrighted work.
In the United Kingdom and many other Commonwealth
countries, a similar notion of fair dealing was established
by the courts or through legislation. The concept is
sometimes not well defined; however in Canada, private
copying for personal use has been expressly permitted
by statute since 1999
[edit] Spanish copyright law
Additionally, the Penal Code explicitly requires
the intention of commercial profit in order to commit
a crime against the Intellectual Property [6].
| Quote: |
III. The International Context -- A three-legged stool: WTO, WIPO,
and national legislation. The World Trade Organization (WTO)
The United States put the basic framework for modern intellectual
property protection into place by the aggressive use of trade policy.
Beginning in the early 1980s the United States Trade
Representative began to make intellectual property protection
of U.S. copyrights, patents and trademarks a major goal in
trade negotiations with other countries, particularly those
in the developing world. Initially the efforts took place on a
bi-lateral basis with individual countries, but in the 1990s
intellectual property became a central feature of multilateral
trade negotiations involving NAFTA and GATT. In 1994, the
successful Uruguay round led to the WTO treaty containing
the TRIPS (Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property)
agreement. Under TRIPS all countries must have effective
systems of patent, trademark and copyright law protection
and enforcement. The World Intellectual Property
Organization (WIPO) Historically, the principal
forum for setting minimum international norms for the
protection of intellectual property has been the
World Intellectual Property Organization,
http://www.iipi.org/speeches/MonteCarlo092099.pdf
World Intellectual Property Organization
"Copyright is the legal protection extended to the owner
of the rights in an original work that he has created.
It comprises two main sets of rights: the economic
rights and the moral rights."
"The economic rights are the rights of reproduction,
broadcasting, public performance, adaptation,
translation, public recitation, public display, distribution,
and so on. The moral rights include the author's right to
object to any distortion, mutilation or other modification
of his work that might be prejudicial to his honor or
reputation."
http://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/collective_mngt.html
Copyright law does not apply unless one is making
money off it, or preventing the author from making
money. Internet chat is not public speech, it is
private speech. Show me where copyright law
applies to private speech anywhere!
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
OM
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 9:29 pm Post subject: Re: straight skinny |
|
|
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 07:11:33 -0500, "Jim Oberg"
<joberg@houston.rr.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
killfile................
sorry i wasted my time...
"Dogfighting" <none@none.com> wrote blather
|
....Yeah, based on his posting style and his bullshit claims, I suspect
he's one of our troll regulars trying out a new disguise.
<thinks>...hey, you never sent *me* a copy of that photo! :-(
OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Jim Oberg
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Apr 23, 2007 10:58 pm Post subject: Re: straight skinny |
|
|
"OM" <om@all_trolls_must_DIE.com> wrote >
| Quote: |
thinks>...hey, you never sent *me* a copy of that photo! 
|
It's in microfiche behind the label of the "I am James Oberg" t-shirt you
got -- I hope
you've never washed it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
OM
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Apr 24, 2007 12:07 pm Post subject: Re: straight skinny |
|
|
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:58:01 -0500, "Jim Oberg"
<joberg@houston.rr.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
"OM" <om@all_trolls_must_DIE.com> wrote
thinks>...hey, you never sent *me* a copy of that photo! :-(
It's in microfiche behind the label of the "I am James Oberg" t-shirt you
got -- I hope you've never washed it.
|
....I did. How else was I supposed to get it to shrink-to-fit? :-P
OM
--
]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Scott Hedrick
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:55 am Post subject: Re: straight skinny |
|
|
"Dogfighting" <none@none.com> wrote in message
news:462c815b$0$16410$88260bb3@free.teranews.com...
| Quote: |
Jonathan wrote:
"Jim Oberg" <joberg@houston.rr.com> wrote in message
news:462a9067$0$17130$4c368faf@roadrunner.com...
The photograph is copyrighted by the owner, Dr. Peter Goldie, so it is
not
supposed to be posted
on open-access sites. But it has been, from time to time, until the owner
tracks the site down
and discusses copyright violation with them.
Copyright?
Many people risked their rears to create the legal character
the internet has today. There seems to be this urban myth
that copyright law and cyberspace chat have anything to do
with each other when involving non commercial speakers.
Cyberspace speech has the highest level of first amendment
protection that exists.
Typical American, the Internet is just a little bit bigger than one
country with 300 million people and their laws, the planet has
approximately 6.5 billion people and is governed by International law.
|
Part of which is copyright law, of course, including the Berne Convention,
an *international* treaty concerning copyright.
Copyright law and the internet are not only linked, they're conjoined twins,
*even internationally*. Try a non-wiki source for your legal information. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
222 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
