| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ed Conrad
Guest
|
 Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 4:27 pm Post subject: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's Boy C |
 |
|
<
EVOLUTIONIST HIDES HIS HEAD IN SHAME
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/TightFit.jpg
<
==============
<
On July 29, 1996, demon@hell.com (Darwin Boy) wrote:
| Quote: |
Scrapings from Ed Conrad's frontal lobes reveal clear
evidence of Carboniferous Haversian canals when viewed
under my Woolworth's Junior Scientist Kit microscope.
Congratulations! You've got a mighty fine microscope there. I've just |
used my Tinkertoy microscope to check out your findings and I'm
pretty sure I'm seeing what you're seeing, except I think I'm also
seeing some bark of the Lepidodendron and some droppings
from a giant prehistoric scorpion.
| Quote: |
I'm wondering if your Woolworth's Junior Scientist Kit microscope |
also cost $32.50 and was imported from Taiwan?
<
Incidently, soon as I get a few extra bucks, I'm going to order one
of those Tinkertoy telescopes. I sort of question those photos being
beamed back from the Hubble and I'd sure like to check them out
for myself.
<
==================================================
<
< HOLY SH*T!
http://www.spacedaily.com/images/hubble-ultradeep-desk-1024.jpg
<
This is the Hubble's greatest photo that was taken of a black
speck of sky shown in a previous astounding photo of space that
it had taken previously
<
This view captures the mind-boggling outreaches of the universe
as if taken through an eight-inch straw.
<
No question, almost the same mind-boggling scene would be
evident no matter where the Hubble is pointed. The size of the
universe is THAT incredible.,
<
All astrophysicists and even Stephen Hawking agree with Ed
Conrad that, IF there's ANY intelligent life in the universe, it
probably exists on a planet in some far-distant galaxy trillions,
maybe zillions, of light years from earth. But they strongly doubt it.
<
==================================================
<
Mark Steese (SteeseMM@jacksoncounty.org) responded:
< All right, who's responsible for this? Someone's actually
< managed to write an 'Ed Conrad' spoof that's funny enough
< to almost be believable as a real post from lovable, furry old Ed.
< It's a little too obvious, but it's still great, especially the
< total non-sequitur shift to the Hubble in the last paragraph.
< Keep up the good work!
< -- Mark Steese
<
==============================================
<
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/manasoldemboss.gif
<
TRUTH VS. THE MONUMENTAL LIE OF MAN'S EVOLUTION
(Fossils -- SOME HUMAN -- Found Between Coal Veins)
<
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/OldestHumanSkull.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/ManasOldasCoal.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/Discoveries.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/MoreFossils.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/HumanBrain.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/TestResults.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/OldestTool.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/Scorpion.jpg
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/MVC-013F.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/MVC-022S.JPG
<
< =================
<
To prove they're the real McCoy:
<
PETRIFIED FOSSILS STILL EMBEDDED IN SLATE
<
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/NewFossils/MVC-002S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/NewFossils/MVC-003S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/NewFossils/MVC-006S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/NewFossils/MVC-007S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/NewFossils/MVC-009S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/NewFossils/MVC-010S.JPG
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/NewFossils/MVC-012S.JPG
<
======================================
| Quote: |
EVOLUTIONIST BLOWING HOT AIR |
http://www.nurple.com/sideshow/
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/SaveTheWhale.jpg
<
Ed Conrad
http://www.edconrad,com
Man as Old as Coal and Proof of Life After Death
<
=================================
<
PLEASE NOTE: We're not only running out of clean air
and water but also Cyberspace. If you respond to this
posting. kindly keep it very brief -- four, five lines..
-- David Iain Greig, moderator, talk.origins
<
========================================
<
MIDDLE EAST NEWS SOURCES
BBC Middle East News
Beirut News
CNN: Middle East News
DEBKAfile
Economist: Middle East News
Ha'aretz
HeadlineSpot: Middle East News Resources
International Herald Tribune: Middle East News
Al Jazeera Middle East News
Jerusalem Post
Jordan Times
Lebanon Daily Star
Middle East Times
MSNBC: Middle East News
New York Times: Middle East News
Palestine Life
Palestine News Agency: WAFA
Palestine Post
TIME Magazine: Middle East News
Topix: Middle East News
Washington Post: Middle East News
Yahoo: Middle East News
MIDDLE EAST NEWSPAPERS
BAHRAIN
Bahrain Tribune (English)
Gulf Daily News (English)
CYPRUS
Cyprus Mail (English)
Cyprus News Agency (English)
Middle East Times (English)
EGYPT
Middle East Times (English)
IRAN
Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) (English)
Tehran Times (English)
IRAQ
Iraqi Net (Some English)
ISRAEL
Globes (Jerusalem)
Ha'aretz - Israel Online (Jerusalem)
Israel Herald (English)
Jerusalem Post (Jerusalem) (English)
JTA News (English)
YnetNews (Tel Aviv) (English)
Zion News (English)
KUWAIT
Al-Qabas Newspaper
Arab Times (English)
Kuwait Times (English)
LEBANON
Al Anwar
An Nahar
Daily Star (English)
OMAN
Oman Daily Observer (English)
The Times of Oman (English)
QATAR
Gulf Times (Qatar) (English)
SAUDI ARABIA
Al-Jazirah
Al-Riyadh
Arab News (English)
Asharq Al-Awsat
TURKEY
Turkish Daily News (English)
UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
Al Itihad Newspaper
Gulf News (English)
Khaleej Times Online (English)
YEMEN
Yemen Times (English)
<
ASIA NEWSPAPERS
AFGHANISTAN
Afghan Daily
Afghan Islamic Press
Afghan Online Press
Bakhtar News Agency
Kabul Press
BANGLADESH
Bangladesh News
Daily Ittefaq, The
Daily Star, The
The Independent
New Nation, The
News from Bangladesh
Prothom Alo
BHUTAN
Kuensel Online
BRUNEI
Borneo Bulletin Online
CHINA
Apple Daily
Asian Wall Street Journal
China Daily
China News Digest
China News Services
China Online
Guangzhou Morning Post
Hong Kong Commercial Daily
Hong Kong Standard
Inside China Today
Latelinenews
People's Daily
Shanghai Daily
Sing Tao Electronic Daily (Hong Kong)
South China Morning Post (Hong Kong)
Ta Kung Pao
Xinhua News Service
INDIA
Ananda Vikatan
Andhra Pradesh Times
Asian Age, The
Business Standard
Deccan Chronicle
Deccan Herald
Deepika Daily
Dinamani Tamil Daily
Economic Times, The
Hindu, The
Hindu Business Line, The
Hindustan Times , The
India Daily
India Express
Kaumudi
Naidunia-Indore
News India-Times On the Web
Pioneer, The
Rediff
Statesman, The
Telegraph, The
Times of India, The
Tribune, The
INDONESIA
Busnis Indonesia
The Jakarta Post
Jawa Pos
Kompas Online
Media Indonesia
Pikiran Rakyat
Republika Online
Suara Merdeka
Suara Pembaruan
JAPAN
Asahi Shimbun / Asahi Evening News (Tokyo)
Chunichi Shimbun, The (Nagoya)
Daily Yomiuri, The (Yomiuri)
European and Pacific Stars and Stripes
Hokkaido Shimbun
Hokkoku Shimbun (Kanazawa City)
Japan Times (Tokyo)
Kyodo News
Kyoto Shimbun
Mainichi Shimbun (Osaka)
Nihon Keizai Shimbun
Toyama Shimbun
Yamanashi Nichinichi
Yomiuri Shimbun (Tokyo)
MACAU
Macao Daily News
Macau Hoje
Ponto Final
MALAYSIA
Berita Harian
Business Times
Malaysiakini.com
Star, The (Petaling Jaya)
Utusan Malaysia
MALDIVES
Haveeru Daily(Maldives)
NEPAL
Kathmandu Post
Sandhya Times
NORTH KOREA
Korean News
PAKISTAN
Business Recorder
Daily Nawa-i-Waq
Dawn
Frontier Post, The
Jang Group of Newspapers
Jasarat
Millat
News International, The
News Network International
Pakistan Today
PHILIPPINES
Filipino Express , The
Freeman, The
Ilocos Times
Manila Bulletin
Manila Standard Today
Manila Times
Philippine Daily Inquirer
Philippine Star, The
Siongpo
Sunday Punch, The
SAUDI ARABIA
Al-Jazirah
Al-Riyadh
SINGAPORE
Berita (Singapore)
Lianhe Zaobao (Singapore)
New Paper, The(Singapore)
Singapore Business Times
Singapore City News
Straits Times, The(Singapore)
SOUTH KOREA
Chosun Ilbo (Seoul)
Donga Ilbo
JoongAng Ilbo (Seoul)
Korea Herald
Korea Times
Maeil Shinmun
Yonhap News
SRI LANKA
Daily News
Island, The
Sunday Leader, The
Sunday Observer
TAIWAN
Central News Agency
China Post
China Times
Liberty Times
Taipei Globe
Taipei Times, The
Taiwan Today News Network
THAILAND
Bangkok Post (Bangkok)
Business Day (Bangkok)
Hua Hin Today (Hua Hin)
Nation, The
Pattaya Mail
Phuket Gazette
VIETNAM
Nguoi Viet Daily News
Nhan Dan
Viet Nam News |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Nordmann
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
Isn't this just a huge waste of server space?? It doesn't have
anything to do with martial arts, its got no discussion to it, and it
has no coherent sense to it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Handy
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:33 pm Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
Who are you trying to kid?
"Intelligent design" is little more than a way to try and sidestep
rules againt creationism in the classroom by giving creationism a
different name.
Get a life. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Nordmann
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:47 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Jun 10, 7:33 pm, Handy <handyo...@aol.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
Who are you trying to kid?
"Intelligent design" is little more than a way to try and sidestep
rules againt creationism in the classroom by giving creationism a
different name.
Get a life.
|
Nothing against creationism. Just, if someone's going to try to make a
case for creationism, maybe they would like to do something other than
have a long list of jumbled links. Also, how is a brain supposed to
have survived for any significant period of time in a coal seam? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Keith Schiffner
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 5:25 pm Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
"Nordmann" <NordmannNick@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1181544453.862618.165360@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
On Jun 10, 7:33 pm, Handy <handyo...@aol.com> wrote:
Who are you trying to kid?
"Intelligent design" is little more than a way to try and sidestep
rules againt creationism in the classroom by giving creationism a
different name.
Get a life.
Nothing against creationism. Just, if someone's going to try to make a
case for creationism, maybe they would like to do something other than
have a long list of jumbled links. Also, how is a brain supposed to
have survived for any significant period of time in a coal seam?
|
They have absolutely no verifiable PROOF of any claims made. It's all a sham and
a cut a dried case of grifting by "priestly" castes over the millennia. Physics
is more verifiable than any faith, better off to follow a philosophy than
anything else. Me I believe in women an motorcycles and not in that order.
--
Keith Schiffner
Assistant to the Assistant Undersecretary of the Ministry of Silly Walks.
"terrorist organization" is a redundancy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rob Kleinschmidt
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2007 10:30 pm Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
Nordmann wrote:
| Quote: |
Nothing against creationism. Just, if someone's going to try to make a
case for creationism, maybe they would like to do something other than
have a long list of jumbled links.
|
All internet proofs require a long list of jumbled links.
When the list has grown long enough, jumbled enough and
silly enough, the poster then claims it's irrefutable.
We have at least two life masters of this form of proof posting
to rec.motorcycles. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
SPORTfighter
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:15 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Jun 11, 9:25 am, "Keith Schiffner" <schis...@bresnan.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
"Nordmann" <NordmannN...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1181544453.862618.165360@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 10, 7:33 pm, Handy <handyo...@aol.com> wrote:
Who are you trying to kid?
"Intelligent design" is little more than a way to try and sidestep
rules againt creationism in the classroom by giving creationism a
different name.
Get a life.
Nothing against creationism. Just, if someone's going to try to make a
case for creationism, maybe they would like to do something other than
have a long list of jumbled links. Also, how is a brain supposed to
have survived for any significant period of time in a coal seam?
They have absolutely no verifiable PROOF of any claims made. It's all a sham and
a cut a dried case of grifting by "priestly" castes over the millennia. Physics
is more verifiable than any faith, better off to follow a philosophy than
anything else. Me I believe in women an motorcycles and not in that order.
--
Keith Schiffner
Assistant to the Assistant Undersecretary of the Ministry of Silly Walks.
"terrorist organization" is a redundancy
|
Heres what anoys me about Intelligent design vs big bang etc.
Few define what they are talking about.
The ED people I know dont say "Well the structure of life shows signs
of ED so therefore the christian god exists"
They say "The structure of ife shows signs of ED so therefore you cant
rip the god i choose to believe in, as you cant fully explain EDs
apparent presence in the design of life."
And Thats fine.They have a point.
The scientists say "Just cause their are holes in our knowledge, that
in no way suggests conscious design by some higher power."
I guess you could say im a believer in ED in a general way.But WTF is
meant by god?
I mean I think on some level something designed reality. Otherwise
whty does reality exists? I mean obviously NOTHING SHOULD EXIST.
Yet it does...
So theres something going on that we dont(and IMO CANT)
understand...though i dont think that means we shouldnt try, but I
digress.
Furthermore its beyond my considerable comprehension how something
could develop that tries to protect itself.I mean not just people,
even trees have defense mechanisms.
Why? How the fuck does it help atoms to group togther in an organism
that on some level is designed to try to exist?
I mean how does the first protazoa, or bacteria or whatever suddenly
develop the ability to fight for survival? Axtually not only how, but
why? And even beyond that how does it actually work? Thats seems crazy
too, in the opening days of life, that life makes it? How could this
subatomic creature even know the many perils that face it that it must
triumph over?
I know know good scientific answer.But ED people pass the buck.
They rip scietists for now knowing what existed before the big bang
but theyve know answer.
My brother sez "scientists are morons, obviously nothing can exist
that makes reality, so clearly theres a god."
And I say whats god? He sez "something all powrrful beyond our
comprehension"
Of course hes a fool and doesnt realise hes just passing the buck.How
coinvenient that his answer is a catchword for "you cant know answers,
so quit trying to be smart and try.""be wise like me and accept it and
be smug" what a douche,huh?
I mean scietists could you a word like god and say "that which we dont
understand"
Some idiots mean a thinking being with a white beard when they say
god.
ill grant only that cause we exist (we shouldnt, i know the
intellectuals will say ":why shouldnt why, why shouldnt something come
from nothing" but thats thir "god" their way of saying "a phenomena
beyond our comprehension happened, why not?" but if yoiu can tell me
logically how it happened then dont be smart.Its bewyond our ability
to understands, now anyways.
Ok, im rambling ive gone completely offtrack and my typos spelling and
grammar suck, but i wrote this in like 40 seconds with two fingers so
f you.
please dont be too critical i wrote it for you recmartial arts guys as
dumb as me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Keith Schiffner
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:18 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
"SPORTfighter" <billamahoney@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1181596526.343447.146720@q66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
| Quote: |
On Jun 11, 9:25 am, "Keith Schiffner" <schis...@bresnan.net> wrote:
"Nordmann" <NordmannN...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1181544453.862618.165360@p47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
On Jun 10, 7:33 pm, Handy <handyo...@aol.com> wrote:
Who are you trying to kid?
"Intelligent design" is little more than a way to try and sidestep
rules againt creationism in the classroom by giving creationism a
different name.
Get a life.
Nothing against creationism. Just, if someone's going to try to make a
case for creationism, maybe they would like to do something other than
have a long list of jumbled links. Also, how is a brain supposed to
have survived for any significant period of time in a coal seam?
They have absolutely no verifiable PROOF of any claims made. It's all a sham
and
a cut a dried case of grifting by "priestly" castes over the millennia.
Physics
is more verifiable than any faith, better off to follow a philosophy than
anything else. Me I believe in women an motorcycles and not in that order.
--
Keith Schiffner
Assistant to the Assistant Undersecretary of the Ministry of Silly Walks.
"terrorist organization" is a redundancy
Heres what anoys me about Intelligent design vs big bang etc.
Few define what they are talking about.
The ED people I know dont say "Well the structure of life shows signs
of ED so therefore the christian god exists"
They say "The structure of ife shows signs of ED so therefore you cant
rip the god i choose to believe in, as you cant fully explain EDs
apparent presence in the design of life."
And Thats fine.They have a point.
The scientists say "Just cause their are holes in our knowledge, that
in no way suggests conscious design by some higher power."
I guess you could say im a believer in ED in a general way.But WTF is
meant by god?
I mean I think on some level something designed reality. Otherwise
whty does reality exists? I mean obviously NOTHING SHOULD EXIST.
Yet it does...
So theres something going on that we dont(and IMO CANT)
understand...though i dont think that means we shouldnt try, but I
digress.
Furthermore its beyond my considerable comprehension how something
could develop that tries to protect itself.I mean not just people,
even trees have defense mechanisms.
Why? How the fuck does it help atoms to group togther in an organism
that on some level is designed to try to exist?
I mean how does the first protazoa, or bacteria or whatever suddenly
develop the ability to fight for survival? Axtually not only how, but
why? And even beyond that how does it actually work? Thats seems crazy
too, in the opening days of life, that life makes it? How could this
subatomic creature even know the many perils that face it that it must
triumph over?
I know know good scientific answer.But ED people pass the buck.
They rip scietists for now knowing what existed before the big bang
but theyve know answer.
My brother sez "scientists are morons, obviously nothing can exist
that makes reality, so clearly theres a god."
And I say whats god? He sez "something all powrrful beyond our
comprehension"
Of course hes a fool and doesnt realise hes just passing the buck.How
coinvenient that his answer is a catchword for "you cant know answers,
so quit trying to be smart and try.""be wise like me and accept it and
be smug" what a douche,huh?
I mean scietists could you a word like god and say "that which we dont
understand"
Some idiots mean a thinking being with a white beard when they say
god.
ill grant only that cause we exist (we shouldnt, i know the
intellectuals will say ":why shouldnt why, why shouldnt something come
from nothing" but thats thir "god" their way of saying "a phenomena
beyond our comprehension happened, why not?" but if yoiu can tell me
logically how it happened then dont be smart.Its bewyond our ability
to understands, now anyways.
Ok, im rambling ive gone completely offtrack and my typos spelling and
grammar suck, but i wrote this in like 40 seconds with two fingers so
f you.
please dont be too critical i wrote it for you recmartial arts guys as
dumb as me.
|
There is no god or gods. Any ways don't worry the grammar, punctuation etc. it's
strictly for the English major and liberal arts majors. 8^) All life is absurd
so relax and enjoy how absurd it all is...
--
Keith Schiffner
History does not record anywhere at any time a religion that has any rational
basis. Religion is a crutch for people not strong enough to stand up to the
unknown without help. But, like dandruff, most people do have a religion and
spend time and money on it and seem to derive considerable pleasure from
fiddling with it.
Robert Heinlein |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rand Simberg
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:31 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:18:23 -0600, in a place far, far away, "Keith
Schiffner" <schistan@bresnan.net> made the phosphor on my monitor glow
in such a way as to indicate that:
| Quote: |
Ok, im rambling ive gone completely offtrack and my typos spelling and
grammar suck, but i wrote this in like 40 seconds with two fingers so
f you.
please dont be too critical i wrote it for you recmartial arts guys as
dumb as me.
There is no god or gods. Any ways don't worry the grammar, punctuation etc. it's
strictly for the English major and liberal arts majors.
|
Ummm...no. I'm neither, but I think that people who are incapable of
understanding and utilizing basic English grammar are incapable of
understanding other things, like logic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Gernot Hassenpflug
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 2:52 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
Nordmann <NordmannNick@gmail.com> writes:
| Quote: |
On Jun 10, 7:33 pm, Handy <handyo...@aol.com> wrote:
Who are you trying to kid?
"Intelligent design" is little more than a way to try and sidestep
rules againt creationism in the classroom by giving creationism a
different name.
Get a life.
Nothing against creationism. Just, if someone's going to try to make a
case for creationism, maybe they would like to do something other than
have a long list of jumbled links. Also, how is a brain supposed to
have survived for any significant period of time in a coal seam?
|
I think the OP is pretty much proof that the design wasn't that
intelligent.
--
BOFH excuse #351:
PEBKAC (Problem Exists Between Keyboard And Chair) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
proehling
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:21 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
"Rand Simberg" <simberg.interglobal@org.trash> wrote
| Quote: |
There is no god or gods. Any ways don't worry the grammar, punctuation
etc. it's
strictly for the English major and liberal arts majors.
Ummm...no. I'm neither, but I think that people who are incapable of
understanding and utilizing basic English grammar are incapable of
understanding other things, like logic.
|
The fact that red equals black does not prove that green equals white. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
BrianNZ
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:23 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
Rand Simberg wrote:
| Quote: |
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:18:23 -0600, in a place far, far away, "Keith
Schiffner" <schistan@bresnan.net> made the phosphor on my monitor glow
in such a way as to indicate that:
Ok, im rambling ive gone completely offtrack and my typos spelling and
grammar suck, but i wrote this in like 40 seconds with two fingers so
f you.
please dont be too critical i wrote it for you recmartial arts guys as
dumb as me.
There is no god or gods. Any ways don't worry the grammar, punctuation etc. it's
strictly for the English major and liberal arts majors.
Ummm...no. I'm neither, but I think that people who are incapable of
understanding and utilizing basic English grammar are incapable of
understanding other things, like logic.
|
How high and mighty of you......Do you live in a gated community? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Keith Schiffner
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:24 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
"Rand Simberg" <simberg.interglobal@org.trash> wrote in message
news:46d0cce0.817428349@news.giganews.com...
| Quote: |
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:18:23 -0600, in a place far, far away, "Keith
Schiffner" <schistan@bresnan.net> made the phosphor on my monitor glow
in such a way as to indicate that:
Ok, im rambling ive gone completely offtrack and my typos spelling and
grammar suck, but i wrote this in like 40 seconds with two fingers so
f you.
please dont be too critical i wrote it for you recmartial arts guys as
dumb as me.
There is no god or gods. Any ways don't worry the grammar, punctuation etc.
it's
strictly for the English major and liberal arts majors.
Ummm...no. I'm neither, but I think that people who are incapable of
understanding and utilizing basic English grammar are incapable of
understanding other things, like logic.
|
Well being as I don't speak English...but can read and write it your point is
moot. I speak American and await with bated breath for American to become a
written language with a grammar the properly reflect the spoken language.
Logic? In America, surely you jest it's the most illogical country this side of
France. The Russians are more logical than we are.
--
Keith Schiffner
Assistant to the Assistant Undersecretary of the Ministry of Silly Walks.
"terrorist organization" is a redundancy |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rand Simberg
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:28 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:21:16 -0700, in a place far, far away,
"proehling" <peter_roehling@eee.org> made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:
| Quote: |
"Rand Simberg" <simberg.interglobal@org.trash> wrote
There is no god or gods. Any ways don't worry the grammar, punctuation
etc. it's
strictly for the English major and liberal arts majors.
Ummm...no. I'm neither, but I think that people who are incapable of
understanding and utilizing basic English grammar are incapable of
understanding other things, like logic.
The fact that red equals black does not prove that green equals white.
|
Thank your for making my point. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rand Simberg
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 3:29 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 11:23:00 +1200, in a place far, far away, BrianNZ
<brian@itnz.co.nz> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way
as to indicate that:
| Quote: |
Ok, im rambling ive gone completely offtrack and my typos spelling and
grammar suck, but i wrote this in like 40 seconds with two fingers so
f you.
please dont be too critical i wrote it for you recmartial arts guys as
dumb as me.
There is no god or gods. Any ways don't worry the grammar, punctuation etc. it's
strictly for the English major and liberal arts majors.
Ummm...no. I'm neither, but I think that people who are incapable of
understanding and utilizing basic English grammar are incapable of
understanding other things, like logic.
How high and mighty of you......Do you live in a gated community?
|
No, not that it has any relevance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
199 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
