| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Keith Schiffner
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 4:09 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
 |
|
"Rand Simberg" <simberg.interglobal@org.trash> wrote in message
news:4702165e.1426126251@news.giganews.com...
| Quote: |
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:10:45 -0400, in a place far, far away, Kirk
Lawson <lawson@NO12128SPAM+dayton.ne> made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:
God I miss being a kid when I could simply punch people like you.
And I'm happy not being a kid any more, so I don't have to deal with
childish and brutish morons, who wish they were still kids so they
could continue to be bullies without any accountability, whose only
response to disagreement is to "simply punch people."
Personally, I find that folks who want to use spelling and grammar to
bolster their apparent score in an online debate are pretentious twits who
don't realize that claiming superiority of a position based on superiority
of grammar is analogous to claiming superiority of a position based on
superiority of capacity for force.
Well, goodie for you.
Glad you can recognize my superiority. It's a first step.
Ummmm... no.
Apparently, you're no only a bully (or a bully sympathizer), but so
stupid as to not recognize sarcasm. Your problem, not mine.
|
Yep go right ahead, stick your finger in your ears and sing loudly Ethel Merman
show tunes. When you run out of songs just be silent and genuflect to your
superiors. We all ride motorcycles and the rest of you lot don't deserve the
rights a serf has.
Fucke the four wheeled culture, they are small minded, morally week and
compleatly lacking in ethics.
--
Keith Schiffner
Assistant to the Assistant Undersecretary of the Ministry of Silly Walks.
"terrorist organization" is a redundancy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Kirk Lawson
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 6:31 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 23:35:14 +0000, Rand Simberg wrote:
| Quote: |
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:10:45 -0400, in a place far, far away, Kirk
Lawson <lawson@NO12128SPAM+dayton.ne> made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:
God I miss being a kid when I could simply punch people like you.
And I'm happy not being a kid any more, so I don't have to deal with
childish and brutish morons, who wish they were still kids so they
could continue to be bullies without any accountability, whose only
response to disagreement is to "simply punch people."
Personally, I find that folks who want to use spelling and grammar to
bolster their apparent score in an online debate are pretentious twits who
don't realize that claiming superiority of a position based on superiority
of grammar is analogous to claiming superiority of a position based on
superiority of capacity for force.
Well, goodie for you.
Glad you can recognize my superiority. It's a first step.
Ummmm... no.
Apparently, you're no only a bully (or a bully sympathizer), but so
stupid as to not recognize sarcasm. Your problem, not mine.
|
No. I'll write it real slow so that you can catch it this time.
What I'm saying is that you whine and cry like a little girl about Bill
lamenting not being able to punch you, claiming that physical force
doesn't make his *argument* any stronger. All the while you're pissing
and moaning about how your ability to click "Grammar Check" in Microsoft
Word somehow makes *your* argument stronger. Now, get this strait, just
because you can click "Spell Check" doesn't add one iota of capacity to
your position. So, ya freaking *pantie-waist*, stop crying like a sissy,
grab a kotex and put on your big-girl panties because... If your position
has holes large enough to pass a a battle carrier group through, wi dont
kare if yu kan spel reel guud, yor posesishun stil iz laym.
So go take your "My position is spelled right so it must be true" lame-o
fallacy somewhere else.
Peace favor your sword (IH),
Kirk
FREE historic Western Martial Arts manuals: http://www.lulu.com/lawson
Western Martial Arts - http://cbd.atspace.com/
"My shoes are too tight, but it doesn't matter, because I have forgotten
how to dance."
"...it's the nature of the media and the participants. A herd of martial
artists gets together and a fight breaks out; quelle surprise." -Chas
Speaking of rec.martial-arts |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
BradGuth
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:07 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
What a pathetic/wussy Usenet group, of mostly brown-nosed status quo
butt wipes.
Intelligent Design has nothing to do with any God that I know of, and
most certainly not of any weird God that knowingly created this
terrestrial mess. Instead, it has to do with whatever real folks or
smarter than us ETs can accomplish with or without whatever faith-
based notions of God.
Cultism is cultism, whereas Zion cultism is just a tad bit lethal if
you don't 100+% agree with their mindset.
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rand Simberg
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:14 pm Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 22:31:21 -0400, in a place far, far away, Kirk
Lawson <lawson@NO12128SPAM+dayton.ne> made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:
| Quote: |
God I miss being a kid when I could simply punch people like you.
And I'm happy not being a kid any more, so I don't have to deal with
childish and brutish morons, who wish they were still kids so they
could continue to be bullies without any accountability, whose only
response to disagreement is to "simply punch people."
Personally, I find that folks who want to use spelling and grammar to
bolster their apparent score in an online debate are pretentious twits who
don't realize that claiming superiority of a position based on superiority
of grammar is analogous to claiming superiority of a position based on
superiority of capacity for force.
Well, goodie for you.
Glad you can recognize my superiority. It's a first step.
Ummmm... no.
Apparently, you're no only a bully (or a bully sympathizer), but so
stupid as to not recognize sarcasm. Your problem, not mine.
No. I'll write it real slow so that you can catch it this time.
What I'm saying is that you whine and cry like a little girl about Bill
lamenting not being able to punch you, claiming that physical force
doesn't make his *argument* any stronger. All the while you're pissing
and moaning about how your ability to click "Grammar Check" in Microsoft
Word somehow makes *your* argument stronger.
|
I did neither, except to the reading challenged. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
215 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
