| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
BradGuth Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:37 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
Ed Conrad,
I would agree that short order evolution requires more than a little
intelligent design.
So, where the heck did we not so intelligent humans plus a few million
other species of highly survival intelligent life come from?
How about a few of us arriving as safely sequestered under and/or
within the 64~262 km of snow and ice that was once upon a time
associated with our salty moon?
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
robert casey Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:15 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
At the obvious risk of feeding the trolls...
Well, God sat down and wrote the laws of science, including the rules
for evolution, ran the compiler, then stepped back and set off the Big
Bang.... And waited and watched until we showed up... I'm calling
that "Intelligent Design"... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Kirk Lawson Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:38 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:21:57 +0000, Rand Simberg wrote:
| Quote: |
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 19:00:44 -0600, in a place far, far away, "Keith
Schiffner" <schistan@bresnan.net> made the phosphor on my monitor glow
in such a way as to indicate that:
Ok, im rambling ive gone completely offtrack and my typos spelling and
grammar suck, but i wrote this in like 40 seconds with two fingers so
f you.
please dont be too critical i wrote it for you recmartial arts guys as
dumb as me.
There is no god or gods. Any ways don't worry the grammar, punctuation etc.
it's
strictly for the English major and liberal arts majors.
Ummm...no. I'm neither, but I think that people who are incapable of
understanding and utilizing basic English grammar are incapable of
understanding other things, like logic.
God I miss being a kid when I could simply punch people like you.
And I'm happy not being a kid any more, so I don't have to deal with
childish and brutish morons, who wish they were still kids so they
could continue to be bullies without any accountability, whose only
response to disagreement is to "simply punch people."
And you obviously don't comprehend the fact that some people need to get the
snot knocked out of them.
No, I do comprehend that. I just disagree that it should happen
because someone points out that grammar is important. But then, I'm
not an bully and an asshole.
|
Grammar is only important to Language and Literature instructors and to
pretentious twits who think that better grammar proves their position is
superior.
Peace favor your sword (IH),
Kirk
FREE historic Western Martial Arts manuals:
http://www.lulu.com/lawson
Western Martial Arts - http://cbd.atspace.com/
"My shoes are too tight, but it doesn't matter, because I have forgotten how to dance."
"...it's the nature of the media and the participants. A herd of martial artists gets together and a fight breaks out; quelle surprise."
-Chas Speaking of rec.martial-arts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Kirk Lawson Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 3:38 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 00:55:19 +0000, Rand Simberg wrote:
| Quote: |
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 17:47:00 -0700, in a place far, far away,
SPORTfighter <billamahoney@yahoo.com> made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:
Ok, im rambling ive gone completely offtrack and my typos spelling and
grammar suck, but i wrote this in like 40 seconds with two fingers so
f you.
please dont be too critical i wrote it for you recmartial arts guys as
dumb as me.
There is no god or gods. Any ways don't worry the grammar, punctuation etc. it's
strictly for the English major and liberal arts majors.
Ummm...no. I'm neither, but I think that people who are incapable of
understanding and utilizing basic English grammar are incapable of
understanding other things, like logic.
God I miss being a kid when I could simply punch people like you.
And I'm happy not being a kid any more, so I don't have to deal with
childish and brutish morons, who wish they were still kids so they
could continue to be bullies without any accountability, whose only
response to disagreement is to "simply punch people."
|
Personally, I find that folks who want to use spelling and grammar to
bolster their apparent score in an online debate are pretentious twits who
don't realize that claiming superiority of a position based on superiority
of grammar is analogous to claiming superiority of a position based on
superiority of capacity for force.
In other words don't be a hypocrite and *I* am the only one allowed to be
a pretentious wanker! ...But only because it lets me get away with
carrying a cane I obviously don't need for ambulation.
Peace favor your sword (IH),
Kirk
FREE historic Western Martial Arts manuals:
http://www.lulu.com/lawson
Western Martial Arts - http://cbd.atspace.com/
"My shoes are too tight, but it doesn't matter, because I have forgotten how to dance."
"...it's the nature of the media and the participants. A herd of martial artists gets together and a fight breaks out; quelle surprise."
-Chas Speaking of rec.martial-arts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rand Simberg Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 4:22 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:38:31 -0400, in a place far, far away, Kirk
Lawson <lawson@NO19258SPAM+dayton.ne> made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:
| Quote: |
Ok, im rambling ive gone completely offtrack and my typos spelling and
grammar suck, but i wrote this in like 40 seconds with two fingers so
f you.
please dont be too critical i wrote it for you recmartial arts guys as
dumb as me.
There is no god or gods. Any ways don't worry the grammar, punctuation etc. it's
strictly for the English major and liberal arts majors.
Ummm...no. I'm neither, but I think that people who are incapable of
understanding and utilizing basic English grammar are incapable of
understanding other things, like logic.
God I miss being a kid when I could simply punch people like you.
And I'm happy not being a kid any more, so I don't have to deal with
childish and brutish morons, who wish they were still kids so they
could continue to be bullies without any accountability, whose only
response to disagreement is to "simply punch people."
Personally, I find that folks who want to use spelling and grammar to
bolster their apparent score in an online debate are pretentious twits who
don't realize that claiming superiority of a position based on superiority
of grammar is analogous to claiming superiority of a position based on
superiority of capacity for force.
|
Well, goodie for you. IOW, you're another illogical bullying asshole,
who thinks that the ability to punch someone is equivalent to
intelligence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
BradGuth Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 5:19 pm Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Jun 17, 3:15 pm, robert casey <wa2...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
EVOLUTIONIST HIDES HIS HEAD IN SHAME
http://mysite.verizon.net/edconrad/FOSSILS/TightFit.jpg
At the obvious risk of feeding the trolls...
Well, God sat down and wrote the laws of science, including the rules
for evolution, ran the compiler, then stepped back and set off the Big
Bang.... And waited and watched until we showed up... I'm calling
that "Intelligent Design"...
|
What's trollish about "Intelligent Design"...
I'd agree, but Zions and the like only have a terrestrial God that's
unusually white and pro-Jewish, thus all that's ET or off-world simply
doesn't exist, especially if it's smarter than us.
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
travisgod@aol.cominyrface Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:34 pm Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Jun 17, 7:38 pm, Kirk Lawson
| Quote: |
Personally, I find that folks who want to use spelling and grammar to
bolster their apparent score in an online debate are pretentious twits who
don't realize that claiming superiority of a position based on superiority
of grammar is analogous to claiming superiority of a position based on
superiority of capacity for force.
|
Who was it who was saying that having poor grammar and spelling in a
WRITTEN FORUM is like making a presentation in a fking dirty suit?
It's exactly what it is.
Typos and occasional error is forgivable. What passes for "writing"
on this forum and others is inexcusible.
Trav |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Jerry B. Altzman Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 6:47 pm Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
on 2007-06-18 10:34 travisgod@aol.cominyrface said the following:
| Quote: |
On Jun 17, 7:38 pm, Kirk Lawson
Personally, I find that folks who want to use spelling and grammar to
bolster their apparent score in an online debate are pretentious twits who
don't realize that claiming superiority of a position based on superiority
of grammar is analogous to claiming superiority of a position based on
superiority of capacity for force.
Who was it who was saying that having poor grammar and spelling in a
WRITTEN FORUM is like making a presentation in a fking dirty suit?
It's exactly what it is.
|
That would be me, quoting "Dear Emily Postnews" from Lo Those Many Years
Back.
| Quote: |
Q: I cant spell worth a dam. I hope your going too tell me what to do?
A: Don't worry about how your articles look. Remember it's the message that counts, not the way it's presented. Ignore the fact that sloppy spelling in a purely written forum sends out the same silent messages that soiled clothing would when addressing an audience.
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/emily-postnews/part1/ among other |
locations. It's been out for over 12 years now.
//jbaltz
--
jerry b. altzman jbaltz@altzman.com www.jbaltz.com
thank you for contributing to the heat death of the universe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Keith Schiffner Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 7:20 pm Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
SNIP
| Quote: |
Typos and occasional error is forgivable. What passes for "writing"
on this forum and others is inexcusible.
|
TDFOYTC. Your insignificant opinion means something betwixt somewhere and
nothing and you are not somewhere.
Cagers ought to be neutered.
--
Nefarious Necrologist 42nd Degree
Some people ride, some just like to show off their butt
jewelry once in a while.
Dum vivimus, vivamus
< 3 )3~ < 3 )3~ < 3 )~ < 3 )~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Chas Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:02 pm Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
"Keith Schiffner" <schistan@bresnan.net> wrote
| Quote: |
Cagers ought to be neutered.
|
Well, ask yer Daddy if he won't do it-
you're obviously incapable.
Chas |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Keith Schiffner Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 10:11 pm Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
"Chas" <chasclements@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ruKdnTvBtKIYMevbnZ2dnUVZ_uSgnZ2d@comcast.com...
| Quote: |
"Keith Schiffner" <schistan@bresnan.net> wrote
Cagers ought to be neutered.
Well, ask yer Daddy if he won't do it-
you're obviously incapable.
|
Gee, why would a couple of motorcyclist need neutering? Methinks thou art
speaking from thy nether regions.
--
Keith Schiffner
Assistant Undersecretary of the Ministry of Silly Walks.
"terrorist organization" is a redundancy |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
proehling Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jun 18, 2007 10:12 pm Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
<travisgod@aol.com> wrote
| Quote: |
Typos and occasional error is forgivable. What passes for "writing"
on this forum and others is inexcusible.
|
How nice for you that you're able to express yourself in such a
sophisticated manner.
Now if only you had something worth saying. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Sam the Bam Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 2:22 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Jun 18, "travis...@aol.cominyrface" <travis...@aol.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
Typos and occasional error is forgivable.
What passes for "writing"
on this forum and others is inexcusible.
|
"inexcusable"
Sam |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Kirk Lawson Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:10 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 00:22:05 +0000, Rand Simberg wrote:
| Quote: |
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 19:38:31 -0400, in a place far, far away, Kirk
Lawson <lawson@NO19258SPAM+dayton.ne> made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:
Ok, im rambling ive gone completely offtrack and my typos spelling and
grammar suck, but i wrote this in like 40 seconds with two fingers so
f you.
please dont be too critical i wrote it for you recmartial arts guys as
dumb as me.
There is no god or gods. Any ways don't worry the grammar, punctuation etc. it's
strictly for the English major and liberal arts majors.
Ummm...no. I'm neither, but I think that people who are incapable of
understanding and utilizing basic English grammar are incapable of
understanding other things, like logic.
God I miss being a kid when I could simply punch people like you.
And I'm happy not being a kid any more, so I don't have to deal with
childish and brutish morons, who wish they were still kids so they
could continue to be bullies without any accountability, whose only
response to disagreement is to "simply punch people."
Personally, I find that folks who want to use spelling and grammar to
bolster their apparent score in an online debate are pretentious twits who
don't realize that claiming superiority of a position based on superiority
of grammar is analogous to claiming superiority of a position based on
superiority of capacity for force.
Well, goodie for you.
|
Glad you can recognize my superiority. It's a first step.
| Quote: |
IOW, you're another illogical bullying asshole,
who thinks that the ability to punch someone is equivalent to
intelligence.
|
Nope. I'm just an asshole who can recognize your hypocrisy and feel no
particular compunction against informing you of it.
I'm terribly sorry your tiny little brain has such difficulty with it,
though I'm hardly surprised.
Peace favor your sword (IH),
Kirk
FREE historic Western Martial Arts manuals:
http://www.lulu.com/lawson
Western Martial Arts - http://cbd.atspace.com/
"My shoes are too tight, but it doesn't matter, because I have forgotten how to dance."
"...it's the nature of the media and the participants. A herd of martial artists gets together and a fight breaks out; quelle surprise."
-Chas Speaking of rec.martial-arts |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
Rand Simberg Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jun 19, 2007 3:35 am Post subject: Re: INTELLIGENT DESIGN PROVEN FACT, NOT THEORY -- Darwin's B |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Jun 2007 19:10:45 -0400, in a place far, far away, Kirk
Lawson <lawson@NO12128SPAM+dayton.ne> made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:
| Quote: |
God I miss being a kid when I could simply punch people like you.
And I'm happy not being a kid any more, so I don't have to deal with
childish and brutish morons, who wish they were still kids so they
could continue to be bullies without any accountability, whose only
response to disagreement is to "simply punch people."
Personally, I find that folks who want to use spelling and grammar to
bolster their apparent score in an online debate are pretentious twits who
don't realize that claiming superiority of a position based on superiority
of grammar is analogous to claiming superiority of a position based on
superiority of capacity for force.
Well, goodie for you.
Glad you can recognize my superiority. It's a first step.
|
Ummmm... no.
Apparently, you're no only a bully (or a bully sympathizer), but so
stupid as to not recognize sarcasm. Your problem, not mine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
Ads |
Advertising
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|

215 Attacks blocked
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|